wankel engine

The wankel is a revolutionary high reliability engine. Why doesn't Mazda use
the engine in more of it's models? Some are even using it in experimental
aircraft. Reliability is a particularly useful attribute in an aircraft
engine. http://homepage.mac.com/rotarycoot/

--
Look at the world today. Is there anything more pitiful? What madness there
is. What blindness. What unintelligent leadership. A scurrying mass of
bewildered humanity, crashing headlong against each other, compelled by an
orgy of greed and brutality. The time must come my friend, when this orgy
will spend itself. When brutality and the lust for power, must perish by its
own sword. -Lost Horizon, 1936

"Dan RatherNot" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:2voEc.21455$(E-Mail Removed)...
> The wankel is a revolutionary high reliability engine. Why doesn't Mazda
use
> the engine in more of it's models? Some are even using it in experimental

Poor low speed torque, relatively heavy fuel consumption?

Rotory is alot better then any wankel engine.
"Ross Slade" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:newscache$45340i$cg2$(E-Mail Removed).. .
>
> "Dan RatherNot" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:2voEc.21455$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > The wankel is a revolutionary high reliability engine. Why doesn't Mazda
> use
> > the engine in more of it's models? Some are even using it in
experimental
>
> Poor low speed torque, relatively heavy fuel consumption?
>
>
>
>
>

"Bryan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:HCCEc.3613$(E-Mail Removed) ...
> Rotory is alot better then any wankel engine.

In what way?

wankel = rotary




"Bryan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:HCCEc.3613$(E-Mail Removed) ...
> Rotory is alot better then any wankel engine.
> "Ross Slade" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:newscache$45340i$cg2$(E-Mail Removed).. .
> >
> > "Dan RatherNot" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:2voEc.21455$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > The wankel is a revolutionary high reliability engine. Why doesn't
Mazda
> > use
> > > the engine in more of it's models? Some are even using it in
> experimental
> >
> > Poor low speed torque, relatively heavy fuel consumption?